The rewards outweigh the risks -- when you're in a group, anyway. A new USC study explains why people take stupid chances when all of their friends are watching that they would never take by themselves. According to the study, the human brain places more value on winning in a social setting than it does on winning when you're alone.
Georgio Coricelli of the USC Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and
Sciences led a multinational team of researchers that measured activity
in the regions of the brain associated with rewards and with social
reasoning while participants in the study entered in lotteries.
Their study appears this month in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
The researchers found that the striatum, a part of the brain associated
with rewards, showed higher activity when a participant beat a peer in
the lottery, as opposed to when the participant won while alone. The
medial prefrontal cortex, a part of the brain associated with social
reasoning, was more activated as well. Those participants who won in a
social setting also tended to engage in more risky and competitive
behavior in subsequent lotteries.
"These findings suggest that the brain is equipped with the ability to detect and encode social signals, make social signals salient, and then, use these signals to optimize future behavior," Coricelli said.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Labels
Nada India peer pressure science daily teen
Labels:
Nada India
peer pressure
science daily
teen
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Comments
Post a Comment